Ah, the fun.
Dec. 2nd, 2008 10:38 amAfter waiting 3 weeks to publish my letter, the paper managed to get this letter in 4 days later.
Re: "Judging people you've never met makes no sense," Saturday, Nov. 29 by James P. Ebert
James, I applaud your desire to be a peacemaker, a noble purpose. And I believe your final statement of having rose-colored glasses may be true. It seems like those glasses are used to filter out sentiments that don't "agree with you." Sometimes when you throw a little light on something the contrast improves and you can see things a bit clearer.
You see this as a "gods" thing.
We see it as a "God" thing.
You see it as judgmental thing.
We see it as a mercy thing.
You see it as condemnation.
We see it as forgiveness.
You see it as life without rules.
We see it as rules to live by.
You see it as religion.
We see it as relationship.
You see it the way you want it to be.
We see it the way God says it is.
You see it as forcing your views.
We see it as sharing the Good News.
You see yourself as a little god.
We see Jesus as the only God.
You interpret what you read to please yourself.
We interpret what we read to find the Truth.
You see all men as children of a god,
You just don't know who that is.
We see all men as children of God,
He has revealed Himself to us in His Son.
It's fair to say that you have carried your erroneous interpretation of Scripture regarding "the priesthood of the believer" to the fullest. It would be wise to become a believer first.
I'm not judging you or anyone else, God has already judged us all and found us guilty. Now, he is offering you His forgiveness and mercy through His Son. It's a good offer. In fact, it's the deal of a lifetime.
Kim Pilkington lives in Nixa.
I really hate it when people prove my point.
Re: "Judging people you've never met makes no sense," Saturday, Nov. 29 by James P. Ebert
James, I applaud your desire to be a peacemaker, a noble purpose. And I believe your final statement of having rose-colored glasses may be true. It seems like those glasses are used to filter out sentiments that don't "agree with you." Sometimes when you throw a little light on something the contrast improves and you can see things a bit clearer.
You see this as a "gods" thing.
We see it as a "God" thing.
You see it as judgmental thing.
We see it as a mercy thing.
You see it as condemnation.
We see it as forgiveness.
You see it as life without rules.
We see it as rules to live by.
You see it as religion.
We see it as relationship.
You see it the way you want it to be.
We see it the way God says it is.
You see it as forcing your views.
We see it as sharing the Good News.
You see yourself as a little god.
We see Jesus as the only God.
You interpret what you read to please yourself.
We interpret what we read to find the Truth.
You see all men as children of a god,
You just don't know who that is.
We see all men as children of God,
He has revealed Himself to us in His Son.
It's fair to say that you have carried your erroneous interpretation of Scripture regarding "the priesthood of the believer" to the fullest. It would be wise to become a believer first.
I'm not judging you or anyone else, God has already judged us all and found us guilty. Now, he is offering you His forgiveness and mercy through His Son. It's a good offer. In fact, it's the deal of a lifetime.
Kim Pilkington lives in Nixa.
I really hate it when people prove my point.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 04:53 pm (UTC)It's fair to say that you have carried your erroneous interpretation of Scripture regarding "the priesthood of the believer" to the fullest. It would be wise to become a believer first.
I'm not judging you or anyone else, God has already judged us all and found us guilty. Now, he is offering you His forgiveness and mercy through His Son. It's a good offer. In fact, it's the deal of a lifetime.
There is so much to say here, but I will leave it with the fact that I am annoyed beyond belief at the idea that she ASSUMES that you are not Christian, that you have no relationship with God, and that her interpretation of scripture is correct. As may people pointed out in their comments to her, she IS proving your point by being judgmental.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 04:57 pm (UTC)Seriously. I feel like our new editor is trying to be Hearst back during the Mexican-American War.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 05:27 pm (UTC)I'm just sayin'.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 05:37 pm (UTC)Unless, of course, you're just linking this to elicit nods of sympathetic understanding from your readership. In that case, hell yes, people in the Ozarks are idiots.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 05:55 pm (UTC)And Nah, I really wasn't expecting to change the world. It'd be nice if it did though:)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 06:10 pm (UTC)I quit arguing with the atheists a while back, figuring they have their own versions of a personal golden rule to follow, so arguing about divinity is stupid. although every once in a while, I like to quote Mother Abigail in The Stand ... "It doesn't matter if you believe in God, God believes in you!"
It's fun watching their eyes cross.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-05 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-05 05:16 am (UTC)I pray she was using the royal We, since I'd rather deal with a megalomaniac than a psychotic.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-05 05:16 am (UTC)